Fact: Anecdotally, marriage does not necessarily produce 'stable, productive, balanced workforces'. The opposite is sometimes true, even independent of the high divorce rate and the incremental imbalances and instabilities obviously associated. Some studies have found there may be correlations between marriage and certain stabilizing societal measures - like increased income - though cause and effect aren't clear. But this does not argue against gay marriage. It argues for more marriage. Indeed, if marriage is correlated to increased incomes and stability, it shouldn’t be a surprise that same-sex couples would also be interested in it.
The
 procreation postulate here is unrelated to marriage, and is unrelated 
to the larger topic. Nothing about gay marriage presupposes that 
'procreation' will diminish. Men and women can still procreate, 
independent of their marital status. In terms of making sure the results
 of this procreation have good, stable homes, though, there may be 
inconsistency among amendment supporters. Tami Fitzgerald, leader of the
 NC Values Coalition, responsible for this list of "myths", has written 
extensively for another anti-marriage group on her reasons for being 
adamantly against the adoption of children by gay people - referring to 
gay adoptive couples as showing off "trophy" children. 
Microsoft
 is a very large company, very invested in productive workforces. 
Microsoft management released a statement recently: “Marriage equality 
in Washington would put employers here on an equal footing with 
employers in the six other states that already recognize the committed 
relationships of same-sex couples.” Business leaders are generally best 
at letting us know what’s good for business, and it’s up to us to know 
when it’s appropriate to factor that into our voting agenda.
--
http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2012/01/19/marriage-equality-in-washington-state-would-be-good-for-business.aspx
http://christianactionleague.org/news/state-senator’s-same-sex-adoption-allowed-and-
upheld/ 
No comments:
Post a Comment