Opinion: “There
is no right to marry someone of the same sex, just as there is no right
to marry your sister, to marry someone who is under 14 years old, or to
marry more than one person.
Fact The Ninth Amendment
declares that the listing of individual rights in the Constitution and
Bill of Rights is not meant to be comprehensive; and that other rights
not specifically mentioned are retained by the people - like the right
to smirk, or smile. Constitutions aren't complete lists of civil rights,
they are lists of instances in which the citizenry, through their
elected representatives, have formalized the rights which always
existed, but had previously been wrongly denied.
The
13th Amendment did not say "hey, enslaved people are now fully free and
human", it said those people always were fully human and should have
been fully free, and the amendment denied anyone the right to limit that
freedom. Civil rights are inherent, not given.
Prohibitions
against marrying a sister, or a 12-year-old, are laws upheld due to
compelling public interest, and which have changed radically over time.
Polygamy and poligyny laws have varied widely over the centuries, even
within cultures. Rights are assumed to exist if Constitutions prohibit
their denial, or if Courts rule against them. This is why, if courts
rule in favor of rights not specifically denied by Constitutions, the
courts are not necessarily guilty of 'activism'. An honest, democratic
court must evaluate all appeals for rights using the governing
Constitution as a guide. This illustrates the Supreme Court's thinking
in deciding, in 1967, that Mildred and Richard Loving, an interracial
couple in Virginia, actually did have a right to marry, even though
public opinion argued they did not. Those justices were not guilty of
activism, but of evaluating the case based on compelling government
interests, and finding none, they were required to decide as they did.
In
a thriving, not crumbling, democracy, the burden of proof is on those
interested in denying rights. Black Americans did not have the burden of
proving that they deserved to be free citizens. It's bewildering to
even imagine what that television ad campaign would have looked like. In
the absence of a compelling civil interest, the rights are formalized
by default.
No comments:
Post a Comment