Opinion:   “There
 is no right to marry someone of the same sex, just as there is no right
 to marry your sister, to marry someone who is under 14 years old, or to
 marry more than one person.
Fact    The Ninth Amendment
 declares that the listing of individual rights in the Constitution and 
Bill of Rights is not meant to be comprehensive; and that other rights 
not specifically mentioned are retained by the people - like the right 
to smirk, or smile. Constitutions aren't complete lists of civil rights,
 they are lists of instances in which the citizenry, through their 
elected representatives, have formalized the rights which always 
existed, but had previously been wrongly denied. 
The
 13th Amendment did not say "hey, enslaved people are now fully free and
 human", it said those people always were fully human and should have 
been fully free, and the amendment denied anyone the right to limit that
 freedom. Civil rights are inherent, not given. 
Prohibitions
 against marrying a sister, or a 12-year-old, are laws upheld due to 
compelling public interest, and which have changed radically over time. 
Polygamy and poligyny laws have varied widely over the centuries, even 
within cultures. Rights are assumed to exist if Constitutions prohibit 
their denial, or if Courts rule against them. This is why, if courts 
rule in favor of rights not specifically denied by Constitutions, the 
courts are not necessarily guilty of 'activism'. An honest, democratic 
court must evaluate all appeals for rights using the governing 
Constitution as a guide. This illustrates the Supreme Court's thinking 
in deciding, in 1967, that Mildred and Richard Loving, an interracial 
couple in Virginia, actually did have a right to marry, even though 
public opinion argued they did not. Those justices were not guilty of 
activism, but of evaluating the case based on compelling government 
interests, and finding none, they were required to decide as they did.
In
 a thriving, not crumbling, democracy, the burden of proof is on those 
interested in denying rights. Black Americans did not have the burden of
 proving that they deserved to be free citizens. It's bewildering to 
even imagine what that television ad campaign would have looked like. In
 the absence of a compelling civil interest, the rights are formalized 
by default. 
No comments:
Post a Comment